auburn: have 3 mascots

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents university
Weight: 0.58
, college
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cambridge
Weight: 0.32
, brown
Weight: 0.32
, oxford
Weight: 0.32
, alabama
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 3 mascots 1.00
have 2 mascots 1.00
have two mascots 0.98
get two mascots 0.97
have 2 mascots each 0.96
have two nicknames 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have 2 mascots)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have two mascots)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, have 2 mascots)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(alabama, have 2 mascots)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(alabama, have two mascots)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(alabama, have two mascots)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(auburn, have 2 mascots)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(auburn, have two mascots)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(auburn, get two mascots)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(auburn, have 2 mascots)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(auburn, have 2 mascots each)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(auburn, have 2 mascots)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(auburn, have two mascots)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(auburn, get two mascots)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(auburn, have 2 mascots each)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(auburn, have two mascots)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(auburn, get two mascots)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(auburn, have 2 mascots each)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(auburn, have two nicknames)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 2 mascots)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 2 mascots each)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(auburn, have two nicknames)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(auburn, have two nicknames)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(auburn, get two mascots)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have two mascots)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have two nicknames)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(auburn, have 3 mascots)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(alabama, have 2 mascots)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(auburn, have 3 mascots)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(alabama, have two mascots)