auckland: have problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, new zealand
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.54
, port
Weight: 0.53
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, perth
Weight: 0.34
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have problem 1.00
have rugby problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(auckland, have problem)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(auckland, have rugby problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(auckland, have rugby problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(auckland, have rugby problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(auckland, have rugby problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(auckland, have problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(auckland, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(auckland, have problem)