auction: be for mats handled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sale
Weight: 0.68
, competition
Weight: 0.64
, event
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ebay
Weight: 0.63
, gala
Weight: 0.33
, purchase
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32
, exhibition
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for mats handled 1.00
be for mats 0.91
be handled 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(purchase, be handled)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(purchase, be handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(purchase, be handled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(auction, be for mats handled)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(auction, be for mats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(auction, be for mats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(auction, be for mats)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(auction, be for mats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(auction, be for mats handled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(auction, be for mats handled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(auction, be for mats handled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(purchase, be handled)