:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(nissan, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bmw, is car)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bmw, is good car)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bmw, is best car)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(hyundai, is car)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(bmw, is car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bmw, is car)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(audi, is car)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(audi, is car)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(audi, is car)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(audi, has cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(audi, has cars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(audi, has cars)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(audi, is car)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(audi, has cars)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(hyundai, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(nissan, is car)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(volvo, is car)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bmw, is car)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bmw, is good car)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(audi, is good car)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bmw, is best car)