audience: be at hockey game

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.62
, community
Weight: 0.59
, star
Weight: 0.56
, spectator
Weight: 0.56
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.51
, congregation
Weight: 0.33
, choir
Weight: 0.32
, orchestra
Weight: 0.32
, media
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hockey game 1.00
be at soccer game 0.90
watch game 0.80
view game 0.76
watch sport 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spectator, view game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(spectator, watch game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spectator, watch sport)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(spectator, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(audience, be at hockey game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(spectator, be at soccer game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(spectator, watch game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(spectator, watch sport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(spectator, view game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(spectator, be at soccer game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spectator, view game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(spectator, watch game)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(spectator, watch sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(spectator, be at soccer game)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(spectator, watch game)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spectator, view game)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(spectator, watch sport)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(audience, be at hockey game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(audience, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spectator, watch game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(spectator, view game)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spectator, watch sport)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(spectator, be at soccer game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(spectator, be at soccer game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spectator, watch game)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(spectator, view game)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(audience, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(spectator, watch sport)