audience: be at show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.62
, community
Weight: 0.59
, star
Weight: 0.56
, spectator
Weight: 0.56
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.51
, congregation
Weight: 0.33
, choir
Weight: 0.32
, orchestra
Weight: 0.32
, media
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at show 1.00
be appear at show 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(spectator, be at show)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(audience, be at show)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(star, be appear at show)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(audience, be at show)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(spectator, be at show)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(star, be appear at show)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spectator, be at show)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(star, be appear at show)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(spectator, be at show)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(audience, be at show)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(star, be appear at show)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(audience, be at show)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(audience, be at show)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(audience, be at show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(star, be appear at show)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(spectator, be at show)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(star, be appear at show)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(audience, be at show)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(spectator, be at show)