audience: be important in technical communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.62
, community
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.57
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.51
, congregation
Weight: 0.33
, choir
Weight: 0.32
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, other people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in technical communication 1.00
be important in technical writing 0.89
be important in communication 0.89
be important in business communication 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(audience, be important in technical communication)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(audience, be important in communication)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(audience, be important in communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(audience, be important in business communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in communication)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(audience, be important in business communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in business communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in business communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in technical communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(audience, be important in technical communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(audience, be important in technical communication)