audience: be important in theatre

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.62
, community
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.57
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.51
, congregation
Weight: 0.33
, choir
Weight: 0.32
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, other people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in theatre 1.00
be important in media 0.78
be important in communication 0.78
is beneficial 0.78
be important in writing 0.78
be essential learning 0.78
be in nacogdoches 0.78
be in tabe 0.78
be importance in organisation 0.78
be based care important 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(group, be importance in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(audience, be important in theatre)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(community, be essential learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(audience, be important in theatre)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(community, be essential learning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(group, be importance in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(community, be essential learning)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(group, be importance in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(other people, be in nacogdoches)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(choir, is beneficial)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(group, be importance in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in theatre)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(community, be essential learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in theatre)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(choir, is beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(choir, is beneficial)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(other people, be in nacogdoches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(other people, be in nacogdoches)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(audience, be important in theatre)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(audience, be important in media)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(audience, be important in communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(audience, be important in media)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(audience, be important in communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(audience, be important in writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(audience, be important in writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in media)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in writing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in writing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in media)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(audience, be important in theatre)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(community, be essential learning)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(group, be importance in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(choir, is beneficial)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(other people, be in nacogdoches)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(community, be essential learning)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(audience, be important in theatre) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(group, be importance in organisation)