audience: respond differently to media texts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.62
, community
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.57
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.51
, congregation
Weight: 0.33
, choir
Weight: 0.32
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, other people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
respond differently to media texts 1.00
critically evaluate media texts 0.84
consume certain texts 0.83
consume texts 0.82
be important in media 0.77
react to people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(other people, react to people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(other people, react to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(other people, react to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(audience, respond differently to media texts)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(audience, consume texts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(audience, critically evaluate media texts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(audience, consume certain texts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(audience, consume texts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(audience, consume texts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(audience, consume certain texts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(audience, consume certain texts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(audience, consume certain texts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(audience, consume texts)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(audience, critically evaluate media texts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in media)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(audience, be important in media)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(audience, be important in media)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in media)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(audience, critically evaluate media texts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(audience, critically evaluate media texts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(audience, respond differently to media texts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(audience, respond differently to media texts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(other people, react to people)