audience: writing persuasive piece

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.62
, community
Weight: 0.59
, consideration
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.57
Siblings applause
Weight: 0.51
, congregation
Weight: 0.33
, choir
Weight: 0.32
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, other people
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
writing persuasive piece 1.00
writing piece 0.91
be important in writing 0.84
be important in technical writing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(audience, writing persuasive piece)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(audience, writing piece)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(audience, writing piece)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(audience, writing piece)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(audience, writing piece)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(audience, be important in writing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in writing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in writing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(audience, be important in technical writing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(audience, be important in writing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(audience, be important in technical writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(audience, writing persuasive piece)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(audience, writing persuasive piece) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(audience, writing persuasive piece)