auditor: assess control risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.64
, expert
Weight: 0.59
, office
Weight: 0.57
, professional
Weight: 0.55
Siblings accountant
Weight: 0.33
, supervisor
Weight: 0.33
, appraiser
Weight: 0.33
, attorney
Weight: 0.33
, lawyer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
assess control risk 1.00
assess risk 0.96
reduce audit risk 0.79
use audit risk model 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(auditor, assess control risk)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(auditor, assess risk)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(auditor, assess risk)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(auditor, assess risk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(auditor, reduce audit risk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(auditor, assess risk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(auditor, use audit risk model)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(auditor, reduce audit risk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(auditor, reduce audit risk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(auditor, use audit risk model)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(auditor, use audit risk model)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(auditor, reduce audit risk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(auditor, use audit risk model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(auditor, assess control risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(auditor, assess control risk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(auditor, assess control risk)