australia: be known as land

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents south korea
Weight: 0.70
, malaysia
Weight: 0.68
, south africa
Weight: 0.66
, european union
Weight: 0.66
, south america
Weight: 0.65
Siblings canada
Weight: 0.38
, india
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.36
, europe
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be known as land 1.00
be known as land down 0.95
be called land 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(malaysia, be called land)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(australia, be known as land)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(malaysia, be called land)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, be called land)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(malaysia, be called land)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(australia, be known as land)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(australia, be known as land)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(australia, be known as land down)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(australia, be called land)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(australia, be called land)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(australia, be known as land down)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(australia, be called land)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, be known as land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(australia, be known as land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(malaysia, be called land)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(australia, be known as land)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(malaysia, be called land)