authority: was shared in federal system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, obligation
Weight: 0.61
Siblings council
Weight: 0.71
, administrator
Weight: 0.67
, state police
Weight: 0.67
, administration
Weight: 0.66
, common law
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was shared in federal system 1.00
be shared in federal system 0.99
was shared in federal system of government 0.98
be shared in federal system of government 0.97
was shared in system of government 0.93
be shared in system of government 0.92
was shared in system 0.92
be shared in system 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(authority, be shared in federal system)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(authority, was shared in system)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(authority, be shared in federal system of government)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system of government)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(authority, be shared in system)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(authority, be shared in system of government)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(authority, be shared in federal system)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(authority, was shared in system of government)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(authority, be shared in system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(authority, be shared in system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(authority, was shared in system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(authority, was shared in system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(authority, be shared in federal system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(authority, be shared in federal system of government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(authority, be shared in system of government)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(authority, be shared in federal system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(authority, was shared in federal system of government)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(authority, was shared in system of government)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(authority, be shared in system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(authority, was shared in system)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(authority, be shared in federal system of government)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(authority, was shared in system of government)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(authority, be shared in system of government)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system of government)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(authority, was shared in system of government)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(authority, be shared in system of government)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(authority, be shared in federal system of government)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(authority, was shared in federal system of government)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(authority, was shared in federal system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(authority, was shared in federal system)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(authority, was shared in federal system)