auto mechanic: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanic
Weight: 0.71
, job
Weight: 0.67
, trade
Weight: 0.63
, employee
Weight: 0.61
, professional
Weight: 0.60
Siblings electrician
Weight: 0.36
, salesman
Weight: 0.35
, technician
Weight: 0.34
, welding
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
is good job 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(salesman, has state job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(salesman, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(salesman, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(auto mechanic, has state job)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(auto mechanic, is good job)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(auto mechanic, is good job)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(auto mechanic, is good job)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(auto mechanic, is good job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(auto mechanic, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(auto mechanic, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(auto mechanic, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(salesman, has state job)