avalanche: be at mountain

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.53
, winter
Weight: 0.51
, team
Weight: 0.50
, danger
Weight: 0.49
, accident
Weight: 0.49
Siblings explosion
Weight: 0.32
, ski
Weight: 0.31
, storm
Weight: 0.31
, crash
Weight: 0.30
, car accident
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mountain 1.00
requires mountain 0.97
be do in mountain 0.95
requires go to snow-covered mountain 0.94
requires go to mountain 0.94
be at top of mountain 0.92
requires go to ski mountain 0.90
requires have ski find snowy hill 0.83
requires snow-covered hill 0.81
requires travel to ski slope 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ski, requires snow-covered hill)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ski, requires go to mountain)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ski, requires go to snow-covered mountain)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ski, be do in mountain)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ski, requires have ski find snowy hill)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ski, be do in mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ski, be do in mountain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ski, requires go to snow-covered mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ski, requires go to snow-covered mountain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ski, requires go to mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(ski, requires go to mountain)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(ski, requires have ski find snowy hill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(ski, requires have ski find snowy hill)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ski, requires snow-covered hill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(ski, requires snow-covered hill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(avalanche, be at mountain)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(avalanche, be at top of mountain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at top of mountain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(avalanche, be at top of mountain)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(avalanche, be at top of mountain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(avalanche, be at mountain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(ski, requires go to snow-covered mountain)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ski, requires go to mountain)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(ski, be do in mountain)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(ski, requires have ski find snowy hill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(avalanche, be at mountain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ski, requires snow-covered hill)