award: is year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.70
, recognition
Weight: 0.67
, honor
Weight: 0.60
, accolade
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trophy
Weight: 0.69
, medal
Weight: 0.68
, scholarship
Weight: 0.63
, badge
Weight: 0.60
, best
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is year 1.00
stop at at 1 year 0.80
be season spring 0.78
is season 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(badge, stop at at 1 year)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(best, be season spring)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(scholarship, is season)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(scholarship, is season) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(scholarship, is season)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(badge, stop at at 1 year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(badge, stop at at 1 year)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(best, be season spring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(best, be season spring)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(award, is year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(award, is year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(badge, stop at at 1 year)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(scholarship, is season)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(award, is year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(best, be season spring)