azalea: be in bloom at masters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, plant
Weight: 0.62
, rhododendron
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hydrangea
Weight: 0.38
, hibiscus
Weight: 0.37
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.37
, peony
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in bloom at masters 1.00
stop blooming 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(peony, stop blooming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(peony, stop blooming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(peony, stop blooming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(azalea, be in bloom at masters)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(azalea, stop blooming)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(azalea, stop blooming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(azalea, stop blooming)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(azalea, stop blooming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(azalea, be in bloom at masters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(azalea, be in bloom at masters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(azalea, be in bloom at masters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(peony, stop blooming)