:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(h, is cheap)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(h, is cheap)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(h, is cheap)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ba, is cheap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ba, is cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ba, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ba, is cheap)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ba, is cheap)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ba, is cheap now)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(h, is cheap)