back: be ranked then quarterbacks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.64
, side
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.34
, big toe
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.33
, here
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ranked then quarterbacks 1.00
be ranked quarterbacks 0.99
be ranked higher then quarterbacks 0.98
be ranked higher quarterbacks 0.97
be called halfbacks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(back, be ranked higher quarterbacks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(back, be ranked higher quarterbacks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(back, be ranked higher then quarterbacks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(back, be ranked higher quarterbacks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(back, be ranked higher quarterbacks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(back, be ranked higher then quarterbacks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(back, be ranked higher then quarterbacks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(back, be ranked higher then quarterbacks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(back, be called halfbacks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(back, be called halfbacks)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(back, be called halfbacks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(back, be called halfbacks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(back, be ranked then quarterbacks)