back: need cracked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents body part
Weight: 0.64
, side
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.59
Siblings down
Weight: 0.35
, out
Weight: 0.34
, big toe
Weight: 0.33
, away
Weight: 0.33
, here
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need cracked 1.00
is cracked 0.97
crack 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(side, is cracked)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(back, need cracked)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(side, is cracked)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(side, is cracked)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(side, is cracked)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(back, need cracked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(back, need cracked)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(back, is cracked)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(back, is cracked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(back, crack)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(back, crack)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(back, is cracked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(back, crack)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(back, is cracked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(back, crack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(back, need cracked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(back, need cracked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(side, is cracked)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(back, need cracked)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(side, is cracked)