bacteria: be at human mouth

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microorganism
Weight: 0.53
, organism
Weight: 0.51
, life
Weight: 0.19
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.34
, germ
Weight: 0.34
, algae
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34
, yeast
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at human mouth 1.00
be at mouth 0.93
be at your mouth 0.91
be at in your mouth 0.91
be at your nose 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(germ, be at mouth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(germ, be at your mouth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(germ, be at your mouth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(germ, be at your mouth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(germ, be at mouth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(germ, be at mouth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(bacteria, be at human mouth)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bacteria, be at your mouth)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bacteria, be at in your mouth)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bacteria, be at your mouth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bacteria, be at in your mouth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at your mouth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at in your mouth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at in your mouth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at your mouth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bacteria, be at human mouth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(germ, be at mouth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, be at human mouth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(germ, be at your mouth)