bacteria: causes infection in cut

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents microorganism
Weight: 0.53
, organism
Weight: 0.51
, life
Weight: 0.19
Siblings fungus
Weight: 0.34
, germ
Weight: 0.34
, algae
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34
, yeast
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes infection in cut 1.00
causes disease 0.83
has disease 0.81
spread disease 0.80
carry disease 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organism, has disease)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bacteria, causes infection in cut)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(organism, has disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(organism, has disease)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(germ, causes disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(germ, spread disease)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(germ, carry disease)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(organism, has disease)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(germ, causes disease)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(germ, causes disease)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(germ, spread disease)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(germ, spread disease)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(germ, carry disease)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(germ, carry disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bacteria, causes infection in cut)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bacteria, spread disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, spread disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(bacteria, spread disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bacteria, spread disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bacteria, causes infection in cut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(organism, has disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(germ, causes disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(germ, spread disease)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(germ, carry disease)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bacteria, causes infection in cut)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(organism, has disease)