bactrian camel: have two humps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.50
Siblings camel
Weight: 0.36
, elephant
Weight: 0.33
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.32
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.32
, giraffe
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two humps 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(camel, have two humps)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(camel, have two humps)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(bactrian camel, have two humps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bactrian camel, have two humps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bactrian camel, have two humps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bactrian camel, have two humps) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(camel, have two humps)