bad food: is vegetarian

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.67
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junk food
Weight: 0.81
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.72
, donut
Weight: 0.55
, pet food
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is vegetarian 1.00
is vegan 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is vegan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(donut, is vegan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(junk food, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(junk food, is vegan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(donut, is vegan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(donut, is vegan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(bad food, is vegetarian)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(bad food, is vegan)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(bad food, is vegan)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is vegan)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bad food, is vegan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is vegetarian)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bad food, is vegetarian)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(junk food, is vegan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bad food, is vegetarian) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(donut, is vegan)