bad weather: affect tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weather
Weight: 0.73
, factor
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.65
, reason
Weight: 0.64
, excuse
Weight: 0.63
Siblings rain
Weight: 0.60
, cold weather
Weight: 0.40
, good weather
Weight: 0.40
, hot weather
Weight: 0.38
, cold
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect tv 1.00
affect digital tv 0.89
affect sky tv 0.89
affect internet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bad weather, affect tv)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(bad weather, affect sky tv)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(bad weather, affect sky tv)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(bad weather, affect digital tv)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, affect sky tv)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(bad weather, affect digital tv)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, affect digital tv)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad weather, affect sky tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bad weather, affect digital tv)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, affect internet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bad weather, affect internet)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bad weather, affect internet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bad weather, affect internet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, affect tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(bad weather, affect tv)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bad weather, affect tv)