bad weather: be associated with pressure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weather
Weight: 0.73
, factor
Weight: 0.68
, accident
Weight: 0.65
, reason
Weight: 0.64
, excuse
Weight: 0.63
Siblings rain
Weight: 0.60
, cold weather
Weight: 0.40
, good weather
Weight: 0.40
, hot weather
Weight: 0.38
, cold
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be associated with pressure 1.00
be associated with low pressure 0.96
is pressure 0.87
occur in pressure 0.84
is low pressure 0.84
occur in low pressure 0.83
be in from low pressure area 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weather, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(weather, be associated with pressure)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(weather, be associated with low pressure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(weather, be associated with pressure)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(weather, be associated with low pressure)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(good weather, be associated with pressure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(weather, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(good weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(good weather, be associated with pressure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bad weather, occur in pressure)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bad weather, occur in low pressure)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(bad weather, is pressure)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be in from low pressure area)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(bad weather, be in from low pressure area)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bad weather, be in from low pressure area)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bad weather, is pressure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, is pressure)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(bad weather, is pressure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, is low pressure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bad weather, occur in low pressure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(bad weather, occur in pressure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, occur in low pressure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, occur in pressure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bad weather, occur in low pressure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bad weather, is low pressure)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bad weather, be in from low pressure area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bad weather, occur in pressure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bad weather, is low pressure)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bad weather, is low pressure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(weather, be associated with pressure)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(weather, be associated with low pressure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(good weather, be associated with pressure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(weather, be associated with pressure)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bad weather, be associated with pressure)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(weather, be associated with low pressure)