bad: be for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, hit
Weight: 0.60
, television series
Weight: 0.55
, television show
Weight: 0.53
, protein
Weight: 0.52
Siblings big brother
Weight: 0.33
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, cold case
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, game show
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for dogs 1.00
is dog 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(bad, be for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bad, is dog)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bad, is dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(bad, is dog)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bad, is dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bad, be for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(bad, be for dogs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bad, be for dogs)