badger: be protected in scotland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.59
, wild animal
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, cougar
Weight: 0.36
, beaver
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected in scotland 1.00
be protected in england 0.88
be protected in uk 0.87
is protected 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(badger, be protected in scotland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(badger, be protected in scotland)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(badger, be protected in england)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(badger, be protected in uk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(badger, be protected in england)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(badger, be protected in uk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(badger, be protected in england)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(badger, be protected in uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(badger, is protected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(badger, is protected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(badger, is protected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(badger, be protected in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(badger, be protected in england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(badger, is protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(badger, be protected in scotland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(badger, be protected in scotland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)