badger: has state pest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.60
, predator
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, red fox
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, cougar
Weight: 0.36
, beaver
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pest 1.00
has state pests 0.91
have on farm pests 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state pests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red fox, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(badger, has state pest)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(badger, has state pests)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(badger, have on farm pests)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(badger, has state pests)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(badger, have on farm pests)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(badger, have on farm pests)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(badger, has state pests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(badger, has state pests)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(badger, have on farm pests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(badger, has state pest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(badger, has state pest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(badger, has state pest)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state pests)