badminton: was unlike other raquet sports

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings table tennis
Weight: 0.65
, tennis
Weight: 0.36
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.36
, snooker
Weight: 0.36
, squash
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was unlike other raquet sports 1.00
was unlike raquet sports 0.99
be unlike other racquet sports 0.89
be unlike racquet sports 0.87
be better than tennis 0.78
be important in sport 0.77
is good sport 0.77
is sport 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(table tennis, is sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(squash, is sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(snooker, is sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tennis, is sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tennis, is sport)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tennis, is sport)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(snooker, is sport)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(snooker, is sport)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(squash, is sport)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(squash, is sport)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(table tennis, is sport)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(table tennis, is sport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(badminton, was unlike raquet sports)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(badminton, was unlike raquet sports)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(badminton, was unlike raquet sports)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(badminton, be unlike racquet sports)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike raquet sports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(badminton, is sport)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(badminton, be unlike racquet sports)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(badminton, be unlike racquet sports)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(badminton, is sport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(badminton, be unlike other racquet sports)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be unlike other racquet sports)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(badminton, be unlike other racquet sports)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(badminton, be unlike other racquet sports)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be unlike racquet sports)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(badminton, is good sport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(badminton, be important in sport)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(badminton, be better than tennis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(badminton, is good sport)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(badminton, be important in sport)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(badminton, is sport)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(badminton, is good sport)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(badminton, be important in sport)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(badminton, be important in sport)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is good sport)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(badminton, is sport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(snooker, is sport)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(squash, is sport)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(table tennis, is sport)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(badminton, was unlike other raquet sports)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tennis, is sport)