bag: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.59
, pocket
Weight: 0.58
, package
Weight: 0.58
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at shop mall 0.78
be at store 0.77
be at supermarket 0.76
be at shop 0.76
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(handbag, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(handbag, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(handbag, be at shop)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(handbag, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at shop)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(handbag, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(carrier bag, be at supermarket)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(purse, be at store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(handbag, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(handbag, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(carrier bag, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carrier bag, be at supermarket)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(purse, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(purse, be at store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bag, be at shop mall)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bag, be at grocery store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bag, be at supermarket)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bag, be at shop mall)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bag, be at supermarket)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(handbag, be at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(handbag, be at shop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(purse, be at store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(carrier bag, be at supermarket)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(handbag, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(handbag, be at shop)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(bag, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)