bag: be made of plastic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.59
, pocket
Weight: 0.58
, package
Weight: 0.58
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of plastic 1.00
be made of fabric 0.78
be made of leather 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(trash bag, be made of plastic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(trash bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(trash bag, be made of plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bag, be made of plastic)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bag, be made of fabric)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bag, be made of leather)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bag, be made of fabric)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(bag, be made of leather)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bag, be made of leather)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(bag, be made of fabric)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bag, be made of fabric)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bag, be made of leather)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bag, be made of plastic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(bag, be made of plastic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bag, be made of plastic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(trash bag, be made of plastic)