bag: have 2 zippers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping bag
Weight: 0.78
, kit
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.59
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 2 zippers 1.00
is zipper 0.85
is zipper repair 0.81
have straps 0.78
have zippered lining 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, is zipper)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, is zipper repair)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, have zippered lining)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, have straps)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(suitcase, is zipper)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(suitcase, is zipper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(shoulder bag, have straps)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, have straps)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(suitcase, have zippered lining)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(suitcase, have zippered lining)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(suitcase, is zipper repair)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(suitcase, is zipper repair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bag, have 2 zippers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bag, have 2 zippers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(suitcase, is zipper)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, have straps)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(suitcase, have zippered lining)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bag, have 2 zippers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(suitcase, is zipper repair)