bag: have broad straps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping bag
Weight: 0.78
, kit
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.59
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.73
, suitcase
Weight: 0.68
, purse
Weight: 0.68
, shoulder bag
Weight: 0.68
, carrier bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have broad straps 1.00
be provided with broad straps 0.95
have straps 0.91
be provided with straps 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, be provided with broad straps)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, have broad straps)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, be provided with straps)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(shoulder bag, have straps)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(shoulder bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, have broad straps)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(shoulder bag, be provided with broad straps)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, be provided with broad straps)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(shoulder bag, have straps)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, have straps)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(shoulder bag, be provided with straps)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shoulder bag, be provided with straps)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(bag, have broad straps)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bag, have broad straps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, have broad straps)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, have straps)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, be provided with broad straps)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bag, have broad straps)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(shoulder bag, be provided with straps)