bagel: be better than doughnut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sandwich
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, burrito
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than doughnut 1.00
be much better after toastation 0.91
be better than bread 0.84
be healthier than bread 0.79
be worse than donuts 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(muffin, be better than bread)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(muffin, be healthier than bread)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(muffin, be better than bread)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(muffin, be better than bread)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(muffin, be healthier than bread)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(muffin, be healthier than bread)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(bagel, be better than doughnut)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bagel, be better than bread)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bagel, be better than bread)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bagel, be better than bread)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bagel, be healthier than bread)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bagel, be worse than donuts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bagel, be healthier than bread)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bagel, be healthier than bread)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be worse than donuts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bagel, be worse than donuts)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bagel, be much better after toastation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bagel, be worse than donuts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be healthier than bread)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be much better after toastation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be better than bread)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bagel, be much better after toastation)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bagel, be much better after toastation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bagel, be better than doughnut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(muffin, be better than bread)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be better than doughnut)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(muffin, be healthier than bread)