bagel: be in york better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sandwich
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, burrito
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in better york 1.00
be in york better 1.00
be in better new york 0.98
be in new york better 0.98
be good in york 0.98
be in york 0.97
be good in new york 0.96
be in new york 0.96
taste better in york 0.94
be popular in york 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be in york)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be in new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sandwich, be in york)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be in york)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sandwich, be in new york)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be in new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(bagel, be in york better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in york)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(bagel, be in york)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in new york better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bagel, be in york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be good in york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bagel, be in new york better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bagel, be good in york)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in better new york)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bagel, be good in york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(bagel, be good in york)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bagel, be in new york better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in new york better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in new york)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be good in new york)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bagel, be in better new york)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bagel, be in new york)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bagel, be good in new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in better new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bagel, be in better new york)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bagel, be in new york)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bagel, be in new york)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bagel, be good in new york)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(bagel, be good in new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bagel, be in york better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, be in york)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be in york better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sandwich, be in new york)