bagel: has physical part hole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.65
, snack
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sandwich
Weight: 0.36
, meat pie
Weight: 0.36
, muffin
Weight: 0.35
, burrito
Weight: 0.35
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hole 1.00
has physical part holes 0.95
have hole in middle 0.89
have in holes 0.86
be round with hole 0.86
have holes in middle 0.85
have holes in them 0.83
has physical part quick 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has physical part quick)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hamburger, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has physical part quick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bagel, be round with hole)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(bagel, be round with hole)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bagel, be round with hole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bagel, be round with hole)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(bagel, have in holes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bagel, have in holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bagel, have hole in middle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bagel, have in holes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in middle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part quick)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bagel, have holes in them)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have holes in them)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(bagel, have holes in them)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(bagel, has physical part quick)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bagel, have holes in them)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part quick)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bagel, has physical part quick)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bagel, have in holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bagel, has physical part hole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bagel, has physical part hole)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hamburger, has physical part quick)