baker: use fractions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.57
, job
Weight: 0.57
, distributor
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, merchant
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cook
Weight: 0.33
, chef
Weight: 0.33
, caterer
Weight: 0.33
, grocer
Weight: 0.33
, waiter
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use fractions 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(chef, use fractions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(chef, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chef, use fractions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(baker, use fractions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(baker, use fractions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(baker, use fractions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(baker, use fractions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(chef, use fractions)