bald eagle: be at grand canyon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raptor
Weight: 0.71
, eagle
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, black bear
Weight: 0.66
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, raven
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grand canyon 1.00
be at canyon 0.91
be at hell canyon 0.86
be at canyon creek alberta 0.85
be at creek 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at creek)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(lizard, be at creek) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at creek)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at grand canyon)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at canyon)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at canyon)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at hell canyon)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at canyon creek alberta)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at hell canyon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at hell canyon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, be at canyon creek alberta)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at hell canyon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at canyon creek alberta)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at canyon)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at canyon creek alberta)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at canyon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at grand canyon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at grand canyon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at grand canyon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lizard, be at creek)