bald eagle: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raptor
Weight: 0.71
, eagle
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.66
, black bear
Weight: 0.66
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, unicorn
Weight: 0.36
, raven
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at ohio 0.88
be at wisconsin 0.87
be at utah 0.86
be at iowa 0.85
be at minnesota 0.84
be at oklahoma 0.83
be at colorado 0.83
be at washington state 0.80
be at in washington 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at utah)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lizard, be at utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at utah)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at ohio)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at wisconsin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at minnesota)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at ohio)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bald eagle, be at iowa)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bald eagle, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(lizard, be at utah)