ballet dancer: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.62
, woman
Weight: 0.52
, dancer
Weight: 0.51
, student
Weight: 0.46
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.36
, pianist
Weight: 0.36
, composer
Weight: 0.35
, musician
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
be at pub 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woman, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, be at bar)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(student, be at pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, be at bar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(student, be at pub)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(woman, be at bar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(woman, be at bar)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(student, be at pub)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(woman, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(student, be at pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ballet dancer, be at bar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(ballet dancer, be at bar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ballet dancer, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(woman, be at bar)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(student, be at pub)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(woman, be at bar)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(ballet dancer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(student, be at pub)