band: have two drummers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, ensemble
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.61
, scene
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sonic youth
Weight: 0.73
, orchestra
Weight: 0.72
, rubber band
Weight: 0.70
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.69
, jimi hendrix
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two drummers 1.00
use two drummers 0.99
have 2 drummers 0.98
use 2 drummers 0.96
have two guitarists 0.86
is hundred bands 0.78
be considered guitarist 0.77
be considered best guitarist 0.77
play guitars in water 0.77
greatest guitarist of time 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, be considered best guitarist)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, greatest guitarist of time)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(jimi hendrix, be considered guitarist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, be considered guitarist)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, be considered guitarist)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, greatest guitarist of time)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, greatest guitarist of time)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(jimi hendrix, be considered best guitarist)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(jimi hendrix, be considered best guitarist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(band, have two drummers)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(band, use two drummers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(band, use 2 drummers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(band, use two drummers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(band, use 2 drummers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(band, use 2 drummers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(band, use two drummers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(band, have 2 drummers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(band, use two drummers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(band, have 2 drummers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(band, use 2 drummers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(band, have 2 drummers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(band, have 2 drummers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(band, is hundred bands)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(band, have two guitarists)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(band, play guitars in water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(band, have two guitarists)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(band, play guitars in water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(band, have two guitarists)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(band, is hundred bands)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(band, play guitars in water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(band, play guitars in water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(band, have two guitarists)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(band, is hundred bands)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(band, is hundred bands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(band, have two drummers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, be considered guitarist)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, be considered best guitarist)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(band, have two drummers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(jimi hendrix, greatest guitarist of time)