banking: is boring

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.70
, market
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.38
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.38
, bank
Weight: 0.37
, bank statement
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is boring 1.00
is annoying process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(banking, is boring)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(banking, is annoying process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(banking, is annoying process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(banking, is annoying process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(banking, is annoying process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(banking, is boring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(banking, is boring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(banking, is boring)