banking: is necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.70
, market
Weight: 0.67
, institution
Weight: 0.66
, sector
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.38
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.38
, bank
Weight: 0.37
, bank statement
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is necessary 1.00
is needed 0.86
is even needed 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bank, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bank, is needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bank, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(bank, is necessary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bank, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bank, is needed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(banking, is necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(banking, is needed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(banking, is even needed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(banking, is needed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(banking, is even needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(banking, is needed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(banking, is needed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(banking, is even needed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(banking, is even needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(banking, is necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(banking, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bank, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(banking, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bank, is needed)