bar service: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.72
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, drink
Weight: 0.52
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.39
, concierge
Weight: 0.35
, mini bar
Weight: 0.34
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, security system
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
requires go to bar 0.94
be motivated by hang out at bar 0.85
be at restaurant 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at bar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, be at bar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, be at bar)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at bar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at bar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at bar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at bar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(beverage, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at bar)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at bar)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at bar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bar service, be at bar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bar service, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(beverage, be at bar)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(bar service, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)