bar service: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.72
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, drink
Weight: 0.52
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.39
, concierge
Weight: 0.35
, mini bar
Weight: 0.34
, salon
Weight: 0.34
, security system
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at hotel room 0.95
be find in hotel room 0.93
be used to buy alcohol in hotel room 0.84
be used to provide snack in hotel room 0.83
be at restaurant 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bar service, be at hotel)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bar service, be at hotel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(concierge, be at hotel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(concierge, be at hotel)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mini bar, be at hotel room)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(mini bar, be find in hotel room)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(mini bar, be used to buy alcohol in hotel room)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(mini bar, be used to provide snack in hotel room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at hotel)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bar service, be at hotel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(concierge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(concierge, be at hotel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(concierge, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(concierge, be at hotel)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(mini bar, be find in hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mini bar, be find in hotel room)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(mini bar, be at hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mini bar, be at hotel room)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(mini bar, be used to buy alcohol in hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mini bar, be used to buy alcohol in hotel room)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(mini bar, be used to provide snack in hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mini bar, be used to provide snack in hotel room)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(bar service, be at hotel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bar service, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concierge, be at hotel)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concierge, be at hotel)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mini bar, be at hotel room)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mini bar, be find in hotel room)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mini bar, be used to buy alcohol in hotel room)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mini bar, be used to provide snack in hotel room)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bar service, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)