bar: be at street

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, disco
Weight: 0.54
, handlebar
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at street 1.00
be at corner of two street 0.88
be at downtown 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(bar, be at street)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at corner of two street)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(bar, be at corner of two street)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bar, be at corner of two street)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bar, be at corner of two street)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at street)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bar, be at street)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bar, be at street)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at downtown)