bar: be in australia called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia called 1.00
be in australia 0.98
is canada 0.86
be important in spain 0.76
be big in philippines 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, is canada)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(karaoke, be big in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(chocolate bar, is canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, is canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(karaoke, be big in philippines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(karaoke, be big in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(bar, be in australia called)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bar, be important in spain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bar, be important in spain)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bar, be important in spain)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bar, be important in spain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in australia called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bar, be in australia called)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, is canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in australia called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(karaoke, be big in philippines)