bar: be in mines illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in mines illegal 1.00
be in mines 0.95
is illegal 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(bar, be in mines illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar, is illegal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bar, is illegal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bar, is illegal)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bar, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in mines illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(bar, be in mines illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bar, be in mines illegal)