bar: be open at night

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, disco
Weight: 0.54
, handlebar
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be open at night 1.00
be at tokio 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tokio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be at tokio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be at tokio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bar, be open at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, be open at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bar, be open at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, be open at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be at tokio)